Tuesday, February 27, 2007

...and then it gets worse.

It appears that fabian socialists have discovered that people are not happy with the government and hence wish to disarm them (see the link).

The part that worries me the most (frankly the WHOLE thing worries me) is the following:

`(L) A semiautomatic rifle or shotgun originally designed for military or law enforcement use, or a firearm based on the design of such a firearm, that is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, as determined by the Attorney General. In making the determination, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that a firearm procured for use by the United States military or any Federal law enforcement agency is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, and a firearm shall not be determined to be particularly suitable for sporting purposes solely because the firearm is suitable for use in a sporting event.'.

This allows government to "define" on the fly what firearm is "suitable" for the peasants to have. How nice of them...

Guess it's time to stock up.

Luckily for us this has no co-sponsors as yet (or none brave enough). My take is that this may not pass as the politicians are aware that trust for the government is at an all time low (what with the Haliburton/FEMA camps being built for our protection). I fear that while this one may not pass, that after the next presidential election that a FAR worse bill will be proposed essentially evicerating the Second Amendment (as if it wasn't slowly dying already).

3 Comments:

At 7:42 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Frightening, isn't it? Time to stock up indeed. I have already contacted my Congressman about this. Unfortunately, with the lunatics running the asylum, America could be heading for something even darker than what Matt Bracken describes in Enemies Foreign & domestic.

 
At 10:08 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Couple this with the "Texas Invasion" drill and it does appear grim. On the positive side, the politicians don't seem to be able to control Iraq or south central LA... What would happen if we just say no?

 
At 11:49 AM, Blogger BobG said...

It stands to reason that that POS bill would be brought up by someone from NY; if she hadn't we probably would have gotten some form of it from California sooner or later.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home